How long sentence for robbery

The offence of committing burglary using a firearm or imitation firearm or any other weapon, including explosives, is known as aggravated burglary. This charge can also be brought if the perpetrator knew, or should have known, that there was a person in the property at the time of the burglary.

This particular offence comes with the maximum sentence for burglary — life in prison. The sentences for theft, robbery, burglary and the handling or possession of stolen goods can be severe. Contact us today for a free consultation. Our criminal defence solicitors can defend you if you have been accused of any of the below criminal offences:.

Tick here to confirm that you have read our Privacy Policy. Road Traffic Accidents Whiplash Claims. Criminal Defence Criminal Defence. Criminal Damage Charges. Drug Offences. Public Order Offences. Criminal Appeals. Death by Dangerous Driving.

From —13 to —17, the average length of total effective sentences for all people ranged from 2 years and 5 months in —16 to 4 years in — Over the same period, the average length of non-parole periods ranged from 2 years and 3 months in —13 to 2 years and 8 months in — Figure 8: The average total effective sentence and the average non-parole period imposed on people sentenced to imprisonment for armed robbery, —13 to — Further data on total effective sentences of imprisonment and corresponding non-parole periods for armed robbery is available on SACStat.

Data on the length of non-imprisonment sentence types, such as community correction orders, suspended sentences and fines, for armed robbery is available on SACStat.

From —13 to —17, people were sentenced in the higher courts for armed robbery. The number and range of offences for which people with a principal offence of armed robbery were sentenced help explain why imprisonment sentence lengths were longer for the total effective sentence than for the principal sentence. The median total effective imprisonment length was 3 years and 3 months, while the median principal imprisonment length was 2 years and 10 months.

Total effective imprisonment lengths ranged from 1 month to 18 years and 2 months, and non-parole periods where imposed ranged from 5 months to 14 years and 2 months. This series of reports includes custodial and non-custodial supervision orders imposed under Part 5 of the Crimes Mental Impairment and Unfitness to be Tried Act Vic as sentencing orders and in the count of people sentenced.

These orders are not sentencing orders, as they are imposed in cases where the accused is found to be unfit to stand trial or not guilty because of mental impairment. However, they are included in this report as they are an important form of disposition of criminal charges. This Sentencing Snapshot is an update of Sentencing Snapshot no.

Data on first-instance sentence outcomes presented in this Snapshot was obtained from the Strategic Analysis and Review Team at Court Services Victoria.

The Sentencing Advisory Council regularly undertakes extensive quality control measures for current and historical data.

While every effort is made to ensure that the data analysed in this report is accurate, the data is subject to revision. The value of a penalty unit changes each year and can be found in the Victorian Government Gazette and on the Victorian Legislation and Parliamentary Documents website. If a person is sentenced for a case with a single charge, the offence for that charge is the principal offence.

If a person is sentenced for more than one charge in a single case, the principal offence is the offence for the charge that attracted the most serious sentence according to the sentencing hierarchy. An immediate custodial sentence includes imprisonment, imprisonment combined with a community correction order, a youth justice centre order, aggregate imprisonment, aggregate imprisonment combined with a community correction order, an aggregate youth justice centre order, a hospital security order and a custodial supervision order.

For example, initially the maximum term of imprisonment that could be combined with a community correction order was set at 3 months, but it was increased to 2 years in September and reduced to 1 year in March Data presented in this section does not include imprisonment lengths for people who received an aggregate sentence of imprisonment.

Sentence lengths for aggregate sentences of imprisonment apply to the whole case, while Figure 3 only deals with sentences of imprisonment for the principal proven offence of armed robbery. From —13 to —17, 63 people received an aggregate form of imprisonment. A total of 84 people were not eligible to have a non-parole period fixed because they were given a total effective sentence length of less than 1 year. Twelve people were not given a non-parole period relating to that case alone, but a non-parole period that also related to other cases.

It is not possible to determine the length of the non-parole period that relates to these cases. The non-parole periods for these people are excluded from the analysis.

A non-parole period was not set for 82 people who were eligible for a non-parole period. In —16, the average total effective imprisonment length was lower than the average non-parole period.

Also charged with theft and two breaches. Offender was 29 years old at the time and had a drug problem. Smith J. Offender hijacked student in his car with a knife, stole student's property and had him drive offender around. The offender had lengthy property-related youth record and history of breaching orders. The offender robbed a woman of her vehicle, robbed two banks using a note. He was 30 years old. He confessed to the offences on arrest. The offender robbed a bank 38 days after getting out from prison.

He did it in order to go back in jail. He was 57 years old and had 20 prior convictions for robbery, no record of violence otherwise. He had previously served 5 years for robbing the same bank. There was a history of heroin addiction. The offender was convicted of 9 counts of bank robbery. He had a prior record of 26 bank robberies. The sentencing judge gave him 26 years and the offender appealed.

The offender robbed a bank with a note. He was on probation at the time of the offence. The offender was 36 years old and had 7 prior robbery convictions. The offender robbed a bank using a note while serving a conditional sentence order. He was 45 years old with a long record of drug and property offences. He had a history of drug addiction.

There was an early guilty plea. Crown appeal of trial judge's sentence of 3 years. The offender was convicted of two counts of bank robbery. After these times there is a sliding scale of credit applied. This goes down to one tenth on the first day of the trial and to zero if entered during the course of the trial. In theory, the ten percent could be given if the plea is issued after the opening speeches on the first day, but prior to any witness evidence being heard.

What are some of the other consequences of the armed robbery offence? Ancillary Orders A court can also make ancillary orders on a defendant if they are found guilty and convicted of an offence. Ancillary orders that are typically added to the penalty for those who are found to be guilty of armed robbery include: Compensation for loss Restraint orders Reparation orders Financial reporting order Confiscation orders As part of your investigation, you may also have your assets frozen with the possibility of having cash or other assets seized.

In addition, the court may demand payment of the following if the accused is convicted: Payment of costs applied for by the prosecutors Although the police meet some of the costs involved in the prosecution, the costs of investigation are typically sought from the convicted. These may include the costs of: The work done in obtaining sufficient evidence for prosecution either at the initial stage or later at the request of Crown Prosecution Service CPS Seeking medical or expert evidence as part of the investigation, where a witness is required to attend Court, the cost of the attendance falls on the CPS.

Re-interviewing witnesses The entire costs of the prosecutor, including fees for the use of external Barristers used by the CPS, can be recovered from the defendant, subject to means. At the end of the case, the prosecutor under The Prosecution of Offences Act will request the Judge to order a sum to be paid for the costs incurred by the prosecutor in bringing the prosecution. Would you like to discuss your case before instructing us?

Get in touch with us now for armed robbery legal help. Get immediate engagement and your best chance of acquittal. Call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Close Privacy Overview This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website.

We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. Necessary Necessary. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website.

These cookies do not store any personal information. Non-necessary Non-necessary.